[adult - he/they] [proship/antis/anti antis dni] to clear up any confusion: ethnicity: mixed: black African [Xhosa], Irish, Jewish, white British religion: multi religious: Pagan, Jewish [also ffs don't start expecting ppl 2 put this in their bios just bc im super open abt it omg] okay this is now officially my political blog ig, im moving my non political takes 2 a sideblog
297 posts
Some Of U Goy Need 2 Grow Tf Up And Acknowledge That Wario And Waluigi R Antisemitic Caricatures And
some of u goy need 2 grow tf up and acknowledge that Wario and Waluigi r antisemitic caricatures and stop calling us jewish ppl antisemitic when we acknowledge that and hc them as jewish as a form of reclaiming them, it doesn't stop being antisemitic bc u just refuse 2 say jewish and say that they look and act like that bc they r "evil" or "cartoon villains" if anything it makes it worse bc its just u refusing 2 acknowledge what is obviously there and then getting mad when we point it out and then u try 2 say that we're the problem somehow
like,,,,
Wario:
- curly black hair
- big hooked nose
- pointy ears
- talks ""weird""
- main character trait is him being greedy
Waluigi:
- curly black hair
- big hooked nose
- pointy ears
- talks ""weird""
- main character trait is him being a creep
stop being dicks and calling us antisemitic 4 acknowledging the obvious and let us jews hc them as being jewish as an act of reclamation if we want 2, personally im jewish and hc that Wario is jewish and a drag king that pretends 2 b greedy as a way of rage baiting the antisemites, would love 2 hear u guys jewish Wario and Waluigi hcs from any fellow jewish ppl seeing this post
goy can interact but don't clown this post
-
forkmansblog liked this · 11 months ago
-
galaxygerm103 liked this · 1 year ago
-
mapsie-doodle liked this · 1 year ago
-
keebiecoo liked this · 1 year ago
More Posts from Chaosclover1999
ultimately a lot of feminists will look down on or outright condemn transmasculinity and transmanhood simply because it is not narratively satisfying. because transmasculine identity and joy does not mesh with their feminism-as-defined-by-cis-women. they see trans men&mascs and, immediately or deep down, feel disappointed. by the womanhood dropouts. feel that transmasculine people will always be less feminist, or that they relinquished their place when they "quit" or "betrayed" their "sisters." they may not even hate trans men, they may not even be cisgender, it's just that they think it would be such a better look for the movement if you didn't... you know.
anyways. without acknowledging this feminist discomfort with transmasculinity and transmanhood, how it's caused by the friction between trans m&ms and cissexist feminism, we'll keep being failed over and over and over again by our own communities. we need to change the narratives we prize instead of treating trans men's identity as a problem to be solved.
It's like some people think intersectionality is a math problem?
Trans + man = cancels out so no oppression
Trans + woman = double oppression
And that's just? Not how real life works? Like you can't come to a conclusion via logic math problem and then insist it's reality because it makes sense inside the theory you've crafted.
You have to check it actually aligns with what is happening out in the world - Which is trans men sharing all the ways systemic and institutional transphobia targets us and affects us.
You can't just tell us to shut up because you like your theory better and you're upset our lived experience messes it up.
You can't tell us we don't experience what we live every day?
personal theory, all of them are NPCS from different projects that caine never finished, he uses them 2 basically play test his ideas
I just read this idea that one of MCs of digital circus is actually an NPC

this also applies 2:
- addicts who r doing harm reduction instead of quitting cold turkey (some things u literally can't quit cold turkey btw)
- addicts who part of their harm reduction is getting themselves addicted 2 smth less harmful than the thing they r trying 2 quit/prevent themselves from starting
- transmascs who want 2 wear "feminine" clothes
- transfems who want 2 wear "masculine" clothes
- disabled adults who r sexually active or want 2 b sexually active (yes this includes disabled adults w/ cognitive disabilities including things like brain injuries ect)
- any1 that doesn't want 2 b sexually active (some1 can b an adult and still not wanna do that, yes this includes ppl in relationships)
- kinksters (yes this includes disabled adults doing kink, side note some disabled adults use kink as a disability aid)
some of yall need to understand that "my body, my choice" also applies to:
addicts in active addiction with no intention of quitting
phys disabled people who deny medical treatment
neurodivergent people who deny psychiatric treatment (yes, including schizophrenic people and people with personality disorders)
trans people who want or don't want to medically transition (yes, including trans masc lesbians with top surgery and trans women without bottom surgery, yall are so weird to them wtf)
and if you can't understand that, then you don't get to use the phrase
the Ken tumblr tag is not a safe space 4 oppressed men and that's a real problem (talking abt Ken from the Barbie movie)
i shouldn't b having 2 deal w/ most of the tag being either ppl acting like men can't b oppressed and r always oppressors or sexualising Ken in a rly fucked up and dehumanising way or making fun of Ken having emotions and his own struggles in the movie, none of u learned anything from Ken's story in the movie i hate it here, i hate how even now i feel like i need 2 make this post devoid of my own personal emotions 2 b taken seriously
Ken is a perfect analogy for being an oppressed man, the fact that he's a himbo makes him a good analogy 4 existing at the intersection of being a man and having some sort of cognitive/intellectual disabilities (speaking as some1 who has brain damage from a traumatic brain injury i suffered b4 i was a year old) and its present in the way the ppl around him treat him, he wants 2 leave Barbie's side for a little bit and she says "don't go 2 far" he wants 2 go 2 the library and she says "don't get in trouble" he's consistently seen as her accessory, the movie mentions how it's not fair that some women are expected 2 "mother" their male partner and that's true its not fair but it also SHOWS us that sometimes women push that onto oppressed men, Ken is very clearly upset when Barbie mothers him, getting upset when she tells him not 2 go 2 far or not 2 get into trouble like he's a child and it's also not fair that some women push that onto men (usually disabled men) and expect those men to just allow them to "mother" them and infantilise them and dehumanise them and then on top of that because of Ken being a man he is taught that the only way he can gain respect is by taking over and starting fights and wars
so yeah, genuinely fuck you guys for seeing a movie about how both men and women deserve better and then choosing to ignore half the message because you would rather get wasted on gender essentialist politics that tells you that women are always safe and men are always oppressors so you can make jokes about killing all men and traumatising all men because each man is the same to you, i am a disabled, gay, trans man of colour and i am so fucking sick of this shit and i genuinely thought i would be able to escape that in the Ken tumblr tag and just be able to see posts from ppl who get it since that's partly what the Barbie movie was about but no, because oppressed men can't have anything, in fact i'm probably gonna get a bunch of comments making fun of me for being emotional because u guys probably also think men shouldn't b allowed 2 hav feeling right?