Reblog Haven - Tumblr Posts
if you use music to cope with anxiety,ย depression or to help with your ADHD (like me) reblog,ย I'm trying to prove a point to my teacher
Clef stimboard but if he was living quietly in the countryside in a happy nostalgic way?
๐ ๐๐จ๐ง'๐ญ ๐ฐ๐๐ง๐ญ ๐๐๐ฉ
๐๐จ ๐ฌ๐๐ญ ๐๐ซ. ๐๐ฅ๐๐
๐๐ก๐ ๐ฐ๐จ๐ซ๐ฅ๐ ๐๐ญ๐ข๐ฆ๐๐จ๐๐ซ๐
๐๐ง ๐๐ข๐ซ๐
๐ชฌ
[๐๐๐ช๐ฎ๐๐ฌ๐ญ: @๐๐ง๐จ๐ง๐ฒ๐ฆ๐จ๐ฎ๐ฌ]
{๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ }
โ๐๐จ๐ฎ๐ง๐ญ๐ซ๐ฒ ๐ฌ๐ข๐๐, ๐๐๐ฉ๐ฉ๐ฒ ๐ฏ๐ข๐๐๐ฌ, ๐๐จ๐ฌ๐ญ๐๐ฅ๐ ๐ข๐โ
Endo Safe
We accept all system/collective origins here.
we always talk about "endos in system spaces /neg" but can we talk about how nice endos r to let us in theirs? how many terms were made for endos and shared w CDD systems too? how much sys positivity in our community comes from endo/endo friendly spaces? like atp, me personally, id much rather talk bout sys stuff with someone whos at LEAST endo friendly. and hell! i aint even endo, i just know i dont have to worry about "what if my sys is not actually real and no one else experiences this and this person fake claims me"
Minecraft creaking HOMEWRECKING peanut and clef
cannot recommend more putting secrets and hints in your creative work that you dont expect anyone to figure out
Real and true
The thing about bugs bunny is that he lives and dies by his bits. Heโs fully capable of killing you if he wanted, but the thing is, not only is he a nice guy, heโs a funny guy. To beat bugs bunny, many people assume that you just have to not fall for the jokes. If he hits you with a pie, you donโt flinch, and eventually youโll ware him down. The issue is, misery will only last you so long. Thereโs only so much bits to endure before it becomes funny. And whoever is getting laughed at is losing. Instead, to kill bugs bunny, you have to beat him at his own game. When he throws a pie, donโt try to sidestep or be a sourpuss, thatโs playing into his hands. Instead, you comically open your mouth and swallow it whole. This is how you kill a god.
@yourstrulynameless
I love it when there's a guy who lost their name. forgot it, discarded it, don't use it, can't use it, had it stolen, even just when a title is used to avoid saying it. all good stuff
my part in a lil map @allbically is hosting ๐ฅด
process under cut
billford animatic i made to the song 'confrontation'! ^^
Its been said before (and probably more eloquently) but I do think any discussion about how self-dx is "problematic" is meaningless until the systems under which diagnosis exists stop being ableist, racist, fatphobic, etc-- I would much rather, for example, that a person identify with the plural community and then later decide that they're a singlet, than have more parts of the plural community face trauma, oppression, prejudice, humiliation, etc from doctors just to 'prove' they're 'really plural'.
Setting that to the side-- I'll get back to it later-- the current process of medical diagnosis itself often includes people who are ostracized from parts of the plural community online.
The main schism between people who are anti self-dx and those who are not (at least as far as plurality goes...) is that those who are against self-dx have a misguided belief that there is a criterion for diagnosis that a patient must have early childhood trauma-- a criterion not present in the DSM in the first place. Though the 'early childhood trauma' theory of dissociation is the most supported and most likely theory for disordered, diagnosable plurality, that doesn't mean that that theory will in all cases be correct, in the same way that a similar chain of events could happen to two people and leave one traumatized for life and the other fine after a few months.
Its true that in many cases, disordered plurality has potential correlation with traceable traumas from early childhood, but that doesn't mean that all cases of even disordered plurality specifically come from trauma (and, of course, since disordered plurality comes often with memory problems, even if there IS a trauma it is likely the memory of it is obscured or inaccessible, and the people who are now experiencing plurality-related distress may not believe that trauma exists), and this is something reflected in the fact that the DSM only looks for current symptoms and experiences, and does not question the traumatic history of a patient whatsoever in screening for dissociative disorders.
Its provable that non-disordered forms of plurality exist (integration - both into a single being, and the more modern definition of the memory gaps and conflicts that cause distress being reduced), whether those forms come after a period of disordered plurality, or if, in some cases, a collective never experiences a clinically significant amount of distress, its scientifically and anecdotally recognized that these forms of being exist.
It is also true that many forms of plurality (even forms that do cause significant distress) are difficult or impossible to discover or diagnose. In many cases, the dissociation experienced by nature is intended to hide/conceal itself as a form of protection, which categorically makes it significantly more of an ordeal to discover-- and even more of an ordeal to have clinically recognized to the degree of an official diagnosis.
Going back to my original point about the system of diagnosis, its also objectively true that massive parts of medical institutions (psychologists and psychiatrists, doctors and other health practitioners, and insurance companies) have implicit and explicit bias against so-called "rare" or "severe" disorders, behaviors, and experiences. Even if there were a hypothetical person who fit EVERY criterion for DID in the DSM, and experienced a provable trauma at an early stage of development that could be connected directly to their experience of dissociation, and was conscious of their dissociation, there's still many cases where they would be completely reasonable to not pursue a diagnosis-- because of prejudice in the medical system, fear of reduced chances of employment, societal ostracisation, a lack of safety in their situation of living, the desire to not be institutionalized-- I could go on.
The truth is; we don't know enough to say for certain the cause of plurality in every or even any case, and it seems much more valuable at least to me to create a community built on a basis of curiosity about different modes of existence than it is to create one functioning on a system of suspicion and gatekeeping.
reblog this to pet the user you reblogged from please
I wish the woolly chafer beetle was as big as a rabbit and I could have one as a pet
making custom guitars in blender and feeling infinitely powerful
shoutout to everyone who wants to infodump but cant string together coherent thoughts to form sentences and instead just look at you like this
Seven Fictional Substances In The Public Domain That Deserve More Use:
You know how sometimes you get an idea in your head? And that idea takes more time to research than you initially anticipated?
โฆSo, yeah, I basically wasted most of my day doing the research for this article. Which was supposed to be my substitue for a drabble. AH WELL!
Anyhoo, thereโs a lot of stock substances that/re PD or treated as such in speculative fiction, such as Mythral, Oricalchum, Spice, Adamant/Adamantine, ect. But, there are those other public domain substances that donโt get that love and attention!
And I, as basically captain of such things, have decided to chronicle seven of the obscure ones. Late at night. Probably when nobody will read them. No wonder Iโm bad enough at self-promotion that nobody gives a darn about my Patreonโฆ
ANYHOO, ON WITH THE THING!
Keep reading
Dr. Alto Clef board for anon
X-X-X X-X X-X-X
This is the most chaotic good thing Iโve ever seen