This Is Like The Funniest Thing They Could Have Made Blaidd Say

this is like the funniest thing they could have made blaidd say

I think I would consider all art I make to be fanart. Everything I make was influenced by what affected me. All of it is a love letter to the art I've enjoyed. I wouldn't be an artist, a creative, without others also creating.

Was waiting in line for a Pokemon panel at SacAnime and I heard these two girls (maybe 15 or 16) talking about what pokemon they would be and it was everything in me to not jump in and name every pokemon they couldn't quite name themselves (they were going off appearance). Containing my Autism Beasts....

E, F, G, H... I... fuck what comes after I

the very next letter:

There's something so strange about how online fandom discourse has reached this point. I'll use the above interaction as a jumping off point because I've actually been meaning to talk about this for a while (I've already done so with my friends) and this makes it easier to have a frame of reference going forward.

So, for now, ignoring the underlying tones and approach of the asker, lets grapple with the question. Is it possible for two people with incredibly different takes on the exact same work of art to engage meaningfully about the art together? I wholeheartedly believe that is the case, provided both parties are willing to have that discussion. Coming into someone's critical space and shouting down at them to 'let people enjoy things', a phrase I thoroughly despise, certainly isn't going to open up that discussion. And to cover my bases, the inverse is true: entering a positive fandom space and calling everyone's taste trash isn't going to cultivate any meaningful conversations either. And I don't doubt that people know this, as I have personally had engaging conversations about media I personally dislike with people who do enjoy it; in most recent memory this is Murder Drones, but I won't get into the gritty details as to *why* I dislike the show here. A post for another time.

So clearly an inability to communicate isn't the issue. Rather, I believe the issue is the 'us vs them' mentality that has been fostered in fandoms since the very beginning. The issue has certainly exacerbated over the years, but let's not pretend like early fandom was a utopia. Fandom most notoriously has had shipping wars since forever, which originally were wholly fandom-contained. The larger public generally only knew about shipping wars either from personal experience within the fandom, or later as the fighting got so intense that real world consequences (or rumours of such) occurred. Now, however, fandom isn't content to remain within its own spaces. We've *moralized* fandom, linked our participation with media to whether we are good or bad people, decided what is acceptable and unacceptable to like on the larger scale. On some level there is something to be said about how one engages with media might say something about them, but this is largely on a case by case basis and in addition to other facts about someone. Someone who likes Harry Potter might not be transphobic, but with additional context (ie, subtly implying there are less 'worthy' trans people) it might say something about this person that they choose to engage with that media.

Back to fandom at large. So we've linked our worth as people to fandom, and now fandom has become something of a taboo topic similar to religion and politics. You only discuss these things with people already within your group, as others outside the group clearly are participating in blaspheme or some such. To criticize a work in any capacity is to attack the group, the individual, and thus conversation is dead on arrival. How do you have a conversation with someone so entrenched in their beliefs they refuse to ever engage in good faith with someone outside of them? Personally, I still have the energy to respond to even bad faith questions earnestly in the hopes that I could get at least one person to, if not change their mind, at least see another perspective. For others, however, it's easier and typically less draining mentally and emotionally to not engage. I don't blame Chai for his response in the least, as he gets these sorts of dead-end bad faith engagements very frequently.

It still depresses me, honestly. I quite like talking about art. I would love to have a frank and civil discussion with someone who wholly loves media I passionately despise, and vice versa, because I want to understand the perspectives of people who connect with things I cannot and those who don't connect with what touches me deeply. Unfortunately in the current fandom climate that is made difficult at best, impossible at worse, and I wish I had a solution. Maybe if we brought back book clubs that would fix things.

Be kind to each other. Approach your fellow human with a willingness to learn and understand. Incuriosity isn't a trait, it's a behavior.

Could you have a frank and normal discussion with someone who disagrees in absolutely anything you say about Helluva Boss S2's quality?

Because, yes, as surprising as it is, there are people who are actually enjoying the direction of the series currently and it's writing.

Bruv idk, you just seems to be so engulfed in your bubble that I don't think the idea of ppl enjoying HB S2 and being able to counter argument your points is even possible.

Not when you come out of the gate like that, I can't.

i cant stop saying "grisp it"