Cozybangtanies - CozyBangtanies - Tumblr Blog

⤷ mots on:e d-day making film | cr. namuspromised

220718 Lysn update

220718 Taemin’s ig story lm_____ltm: Thank you everyone Thank you for all the birthday wishes🙇🏻‍♂️

Not trying to revere our bangtan boys as savior activists or otherwise put them on a pedestal but you have to admit, jhope releasing = equal sign in south korea's current political climate is a brave step.

Consider how the newly elected president has pledged to bisband the ministry of gender equality and family, or how this year's pride parade in seoul had roughly 15,000 protestors (in contrast to the roughly 13,000 pride participants).

And then you get jhope, one of the biggest artists in the country right now, dropping a song DIRECTLY advocating for intersectionality, for reaching equality. Mind you, the idea that equality is something that still needs to be reached in South Korea is a very polarized idea, with majority men arguing that women no longer face inequality and that feminism is misandry.

Jhope writes:

We fought our way up fair and square

Confused and frustrated

Thе world is wide

But people havе a very narrow mind

It doesn't have to be the same

Why is being different a sin?

Beyond age

Beyond gender

Across the borders

Maybe it's like homework for everyone

Awaken them that it is just a difference

Not something to discriminate against

Starting with myself

You must know that the victims of prejudice

Are none other than ourselves

And then this follows into the bridge that goes (in English):

Hate'll paralyze your mind

Gotta see the other side

It costs ya nothin’ to be kind

Allow me three to five business days to just....wallow in this please

210220 Taemin vlive  👐🏻💋

220712 - jin on instagram: please let me take a photo alone (trans. cr. btstranslation_)

HEARTSTOPPER CAST AT PRIDE IN LONDON 2022

Yeah like that… 👆🏻

Abort The Court - Minneapolis

One particularly maddening aspect of our current politics is that Democrats feel beholden to rules that Republicans feel entitled to burn. Democrats creatively interpret rules in ways that inevitably frustrate their ability to wield power, while Republicans creatively use their power to get around the rules. Democrats invent constraints on themselves, ostensibly to restrict Republicans, while these same Republicans long ago decided to use maximal power to achieve their goals.

Abortion services should be provided on federal lands; abortion providers should be deputized by the federal government to protect them from state bounty hunters; people seeking abortion services should be granted safe passage to these facilities, or out of state if need be.

But every time I or anybody else makes arguments for strong executive action to protect people from Republicans, somebody, often a liberal or Democrat, says that the Hyde Amendment prevents the federal government from funding abortions. Anybody who lived through the Trump administration should know that the law rarely outright “prevents” things, and “funding” is a matter of interpretation, but Twitter is awash in so many Hyde takes you’d think it was the 28th Amendment to the Constitution.

So let’s talk about the Hyde Amendment and what it says. Because when you really look at it, you’ll see it’s a paper tiger: While it is harrowingly effective at preventing poor and vulnerable people from getting the health care they need, it is easily shredded by a committed executive at the head of a massive administrative state.

The Hyde Amendment was proposed in 1976, three years after the landmark decision in Roe v. Wade, by Illinois Representative Henry Hyde, a white male Republican who didn’t like abortion rights. He proposed a rider to the funding bill for the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare (now called the Department of Health and Human Services) that prohibited federal Medicaid funds from being used to pay for women to get abortions.

The amendment passed both houses of Congress, and has been a feature of every budget bill since. The amendment and its modern versions prevent people enrolled in Medicaid or other government-run programs from using those insurance dollars for abortion procedures, except in the cases of rape or incest, or in cases where the life of the mother is at risk. Hyde Amendment–esque language has since been inserted into a number of health care bills, including the Affordable Care Act.

That’s it, that’s the whole thing.

This is not to say the Hyde Amendment isn’t a smoldering hunk of misogynist garbage that restricts access to abortion for millions of mostly poor women (often with the complicity of the Democratic Party, which is ostensibly elected to protect impoverished people). But, this boogey-man that Democrats argue constrains the commander in chief from providing health care to US citizens is not and has never been some insurmountable prohibition on federal government action.

The idea that the Hyde Amendment restricts all federal action for abortion services is a clear misreading of the amendment. The Hyde Amendment does not, for instance, prevent the government from allowing people in federal prisons to seek abortion services. It does not prevent people being held in immigration custody from being allowed to seek abortion services. And the astute reader will notice that exceptions in the case of rape and incest are written right into the regulation. It is simply inaccurate to say that the amendment, in its current form, prevents the federal government from doing anything that could lead to an abortion. The Hyde Amendment is about insurance coverage.

Those are just the facts. What one should do with the knowledge of those facts is open for interpretation. What one should do with knowledge of those facts while in charge of the executive branch of government is still another thing. I will stipulate that everything I am about to say will be disputed by Republicans. If that matters to you, I do not know how to help you. I do not allow my thinking to be cabled within the confines of “what Republicans agree with” because my desire to live in a pluralistic society built on justice and equality outweighs my desire to be liked by The New York Times. But in my opinion, this now-boilerplate budget amendment cannot prevent the might of the executive office from fighting for women’s rights. Here are four obvious workarounds.

The point of all of these suggestions is that Biden and the Democrats should use power maximally while they have it to prevent the atrocity of people being forced to give birth against their will. The argument that executive inaction is not only justified but required by a 1976 budget rider is intellectually dishonest, and literal evidence that one doesn’t perceive forced birth as a fundamentally illegitimate use of state power.

There is no law, yet, that prevents the federal government from helping rape survivors. There is no law, yet, that requires the federal government to throw up its hands every time it hits the borders of Texas.

There will be laws to do both of those things should Republicans take back Congress and the White House, because Republicans use power when they have it. Maybe Democrats should take a page out of the GOP playbook and try out the whole “using power” thing, before it’s too late for women, the LGBTQ community, and democracy.

👉🏿 https://www.thenation.com/article/politics/hyde-amendment-abortion-biden/tnamp/

Some of the abortion funds you can donate to:

Abortion Care Network

The Jane Fund of Central Massachusetts

Whole Woman's Health

Repro Legal Defense Fund

Jane's Due Process

Cobalt Advocates

New Orleans Abortion Fund

Baltimore Abortion Fund

Kansas Abortion Fund

The Afiya Center

Yellowhammer Fund

Lilith Fund

Texas Equal Access Fund

Holler Health Justice

Tampa Bay Abortion Fund

Roe Fund of Oklahoma

New York Abortion Access Fund

Chicago Abortion Fund

“queerbaiting in real life” you mean exploring self expression regardless of the outcome bc it’s good for you and not owing it to people to come out??? 😭😭😭

220623 amazingsat_official ig update with Kibum

Finally, some good news.

👉🏿 https://www.nytimes.com/2021/12/16/health/abortion-pills-fda.html

abortion is a human right. my partner and I have compiled an exhaustive document with links to abortion funds and pro-choice organizations to support during this time, including state-specific resources. please consider donating + sharing!!! 

linked: here

to my fellow usamericans….in light of the supreme court overturning roe v wade, well known organizations like planned parenthood dont need your money right now - they have plenty - if you’re going to donate, donate to your local or state abortion funds

I’m just bringing pink barbie koo to you, I think it’s a really pretty edit 😊

https://twitter.com/jeonfcs/status/1540216747328163840?s=21&t=migxEpSdG0qQlgMWw4p5NA

Awwww, he's a Barbie Koo in a Barbie World. The lyrics are true, "Imagination/Life is your creation"

Cinematic parallels

jungkook x left and right teaser

This Genre of Yoonmin Pics

Yoongi making an appearance on Jimins Instagram in the cutest way

Always bickering these two. Lmao I love this so much I swear. And it's like a recreation almost of this 2014 yoonmin selca

And it really just fits in with these other photos too lmfao because it's just so them. So much bickering too. The looks like a photo bomb.

And just because it fits the same vibes. Can we talk about why did Yoongi used to always choke Jimin so much?! Lmfaooo

The way they bicker. It's their love language 🥺🥰 And I love them! So much

peas in a pot

jimin ♡ inkigayo (220619)