Westerns That Have Lee Van Cleef In Them (or Lee Van Cleef In Westerns)

westerns that have lee van cleef in them (or lee van cleef in westerns)

A Few Dollars More (1965)

Day of Anger (1967)

Death Rides A Horse (1967)

Sabata (1969)

Return of Sabata (1971)

Take A Hard Ride (1975)

the one thing that keeps throwing me about both dollars trilogy order in general and supernatural man with no name au specifically is that in a way, of all the incarnations of the man with no name, somehow blondie seems the most mature, or at least like he's experienced the most.

i think some of that is that blondie's more of an asshole than the others and therefore seems somewhat more like he's been burned before and hardened over time (though i will admit his specific brand of cynicism does also strike me as a tad juvenile, or at least appealing to my bitter teenage self). i think some of that is also just the order the films came out in and their actor aging (though, granted, not by much).

but also: manco specifically, in comparison to mortimer, just seems so young. he's impulsive, at least more than his partner. he's hotblooded. he's kind of goofy (case in point: the dynamite scene). he has a certain impishness to him, which is also very present in with joe a fistful of dollars, whereas blondie just strikes me as kind of a prick. blondie isn't lighthearted in the same way–he feels weighed down, feels like he's bullshitting. manco, and especially joe, come across to me as having a sincerity that blondie absolutely does not.

and it's weird, because it's that exact lightheartedness that initially struck me as otherworldly, too. blondie, in a way, feels more real, more gritty, more sensible–and in a way more fearful, though he hides it well. more calculated and less instinctive. and yet, with regard to trilogy order, this should be the earliest point, and with regards to supernatural man with no name theory, should be the least human. joe is all folktale, manco skirts the line, but blondie is just...a very skilled guy that's hard to read, or he seems that way to me.

so my next thought is that maybe it's something to do with narratorial control:

joe doesn't have a partner, so there's no one competing to tell the story and we see him as he'd most like to be seen: unreadable, a myth as much as a man (case in point, the ending), always two steps ahead of everybody else, dangerous but at times benevolent. and i think it's important that after he gets beaten up, which given how well everything has been going until that point feels rather jarring, that he has this moment where he peeks out between these two boards and looks nearly into the camera–it's almost a break of the fourth wall, and it feels like this moment of honesty, like he's telling you "and this is what really happened: i got my ass kicked."

meanwhile, manco is still kind of lighthearted and otherworldly, but he's more human, less infallible, somewhere between a folktale and just some kid with a gun. because mortimer is there, and his narrative viewpoint is competing with manco's.

and then blondie feels the least otherworldly, because this is tuco's story more than his, and to tuco he isn't a myth, he's just a man. tuco sees through his bullshit and consequently so do we, at least a little, because they're both fighting to tell the story how they want.

but also–it's a continuous series and also it isn't, and you know, it is what it is.

i love characters with an innate ability to just fucking survive

bestie you should be dead but you arent fucking how

Do you ever go back to Teen Wolf season 2 and wonder 'wtf Derek'

Teen Wolf Gives Zero Shits About Isaac Lahey

There are probably about billion things wrong with Teen Wolf. But I think my least favorite Shitty Thing Teen Wolf Did™ is the way they reveal to you Isaac’s backstory. The way they’re so offhanded about the abuse he’s suffered. Let me talk you on a walk back to season two.

Afficher davantage

Okay i don't care i'm reblogging my own post but i did BASIC RESEARCH on IED (intermittent explosive disorder) and Risperdal (an antipsychotic) and came to the conclusion that the writers of Teen Wolf should try something called 'looking up what the fuck they're talking about' every once in a while

(Please keep in mind that I am in no way a health professional, that all my informations come from various websites, and that therefore it's probably incorrect, so please correct me if any information is wrong or offensive or anything)

So from the show 'Teen Wolf', and the episode 04x05: I.E.D, we learn that Liam, Scott's newly turned beta, has been diagnosed with Intermittent Explosive Disorder.

Now we'll go to the scene right before that. Liam learns that his lacrosse team will be playing against his old school, and goes to talk with a previous teammate. When provoqued, Liam does not attack anyone -instead he digs his claws into his own skin-. Then he is taken to the lockers by Scott and Stiles, who BLAST WATER AT HIM. I've searched a lot of websites, and oddly enough, pushing someone under a shower to calm them down was never recommended. You know, people tend to advise actually talking to the person, giving them space, and not physically restraining them before throwing them under water. But, Liam is a werewolf, so we'll let that slide... i guess.

When confronted by Scott, Liam explains that he crashed his coach's car, after being benched for the whole season. He got kicked out for it, went for a psychiatric evaluation, and was diagnosed with IED.

Ok, so what exactly is Intermittent Explosive Disorder, and what is Risperdal, the antipsychotic Liam says he used to take?

Intermittent Explosive Disorder, or IED, is a mental health disorder that causes the individual to experience recurrent aggressive outbursts. These outbursts can lead to argumentative behaviours, shouting, altercations, threatening, physical assault, damage to property. The exact cause for the disorder is unknown, but some possible causes are brain chemistry, genetics, post traumatic stress disorder, trauma, or growing up in an abusive environment. Having this disorder can lead to an increased risk for impaired relationships, troubles at work/home/school, problems with substance use, physical health problems, and other mental disorders.

And, in order to treat it, Liam is given Risperdal.

He describes the drug as making him 'tired', hence why he stopped taking it... and, fun fact? Risperdal has lots of side effects. Like, a lot. And doesn't work on everyone. So Liam deciding to stop taking it, when Risperdal is known for having, as side effects, drowsiness, headache, insomnia, anxiety, increased appetite, gastrointestinal disturbances, tremors, impaired temperature regulation, difficulties concentrating and more? Not as absurd as Stiles tries to make us think it is.

Throughout the show, we see Liam being prone to those outbursts, and out of dozens and dozens of episodes, what progression do we see? What do we learn about him and his condition?

...

Well.

We certainly know that 'anger makes him stronger'. That he asks Scott to punch him, in order for him to get angry, and stronger. That his anger is used by pretty much everyone. That his mental health problems are dismissed with a few encouraging words.

By season 6, he still has violent outbursts and no one -except for Theo, hurray- seems to care to help with it, he is not shown following any kind of treatment (except for a mantra and getting an anchor, which do not always work), the only thing we know is "I'm still working on my anger". Oh, but wait, there is an improvement! Instead of hurting others, Liam hurts himself!

Which... by the show's logic... is... good?

Liam voluntarily punches walls, breaks his hands, hurts himself, in order to not hurt others, and no one does anything about it. Instead, he's known for being the strongest beta, for how his anger leads him to become stronger... and the fact that IED can cause significant distress, the idea that there could be treatment for it, ways to help -like, therapy- is barely touched upon.

Oh, and the fact that people with IED or that take Risperdal are advised not to take alcohol? Never mentionned. Who cares about the actual disorder, when you can label it 'anger issues' and get on with the plot?

But really. Do the showrunners find this funny? Did they think 'let's say he has anger issues and use that whenever we need someone super strong'? As someone struggling with mental health issues, I kind of fail to find this humorous. Liam is mocked, chained, hurts himself physically, is offered no -as far as we can see- actual therapy or medications that work for him.

I am obviously not implying that IED is all his character should focus on. Liam is a complex characters, with flaws, values, who we see forming relationships and having storylines and being, seriously, an amazing character. What I'm trying to say is that once more, mental health is, in my opinion, shown in a very one dimensional way, focusing more on showing an individual's outbursts and being in pain, than on the individual being... an individual. I think the showrunners did not do a sufficient job at talking and researching about IED, that they narrowed it down to 'anger issues', and only used it when useful.

And sorry if this is more of a rant than anything, but this kind of behaviour fucking pisses me off.

(Sources: verywellhealth.com, medicalnewstoday.com, verywellmind.com, mayoclinic.org, healthline.com, psychcentral.com, clevelandclinic.org, nami.org, drugs.com)

Every day I wake up and remember Liam Dunbar was underdevelopped by the showrunners