First And Second Are The Most Popular When It Comes To Reader Insert Fanfiction, And First And Third,

First and second are the most popular when it comes to reader insert fanfiction, and first and third, although third dominates, are the most popular when it comes to character fanfiction.

I've found that first person is a lot more common in RPF fanfiction, but I still get the odd few crop up when I'm scouring character fanfiction. Most notably in DC or Marvel.

E.g; works can be marked by the style of perspective written in and also searched by or filtered by the perspective written in.

I ask because I am someone who absolutely never reads first person literature, and often I come across fanfiction where the summary is in third person but once you click on the fanfiction the entire story is in first person POV. Its only a mild annoyance, but as far as features go its one that I, myself, would find very beneficial.

Sexual rpf of minors is csem in the same manner that drawn nsfw of real minors is csem; The writer is sexually exploiting this minor and their likeness. Regardless of the legality of it (because legality is subjective), it is in fact exploitative and unethical to make nsfw of a real child in any manner. Children are incapable of consenting to having fiction of themselves in sexual situations written, you are only able to do so non-consensually.

"Regardless of the legality of it—"

Nope.

Anti: Comes onto my very obviously proship blog and makes a shitty comment about proshipping thinking I'll magically agree with them Me: Does Not Agree AntI: 😡😡 now I'm gonna go through all your posts and leave even more shitty comments and then block you and whine about it on my blog 😡😡

I'm about to poke the hornet's nest with a bat at mach 9 speed, but:

Pedophilia is used by antis as propaganda.

By the way, absolutely nobody is telling you that you can't dislike something or never ever talk about disliking something. What we are saying is to stop fucking battering ramming into spaces intended for the people who do and shouting your dislike at the same volume as a fucking jet engine.

It can be as simple as using an 'anti' tag instead of just the common tag.

Every goddamn day I see people deliberately pushing their hate and negativity into spaces literally constructed around people liking something and then lashing out and whining when people tell them to gtfo and its like, nope. They have a point. You don't walk into a smoothie store just to bitch about how much you hate smoothies.

There are places for positivity and places for negativity. If you stay in the one you belong to, nobody is going to silence you.

(The same anon from the CSEM thing, sorry)

When you said that even hyper-realistic art of a child could be considered CSEM, even if it was tecnically fake, a question popped out of my mind for some reason:

What if a artist decided to draw a fictional child character in a sexualized manner with a realistic artstyle, will this count as CSEM, even if the child doesn't exist?

(Sorry if I keep doing this type of questions)

As before this does technically hinge on the laws of where the content exists and where the creator who made it resides. The laws regarding visual images are often far more restrictive than those regarding literature.

For example, under the 2009 Coroners and Justice Act (s62-s68) within the United Kingdom it would be illegal if the artwork depicted sexual acts with a child or was explicitly focused on their genitals whether or not the child was real or fictional.

In the United States, the 2003 PROTECT Act defines that hyper-realistic sexual images (drawn, manipulated, ect) can only be prosecuted if they are indistinguishable from an image of a real child or cannot be proven as artificially created.

In Japan, however, pornography of fictional minors, even hyper-realistic, is a lucrative, legal and normalised industry. Its seen in everything from street art to manga.