majokkid - Magia Records
Magia Records

A magical journal and exploration of the potential power of 魔法少女 (mahō shōjo) by Lachan (they/them)

69 posts

Majokkid - Magia Records

majokkid - Magia Records
  • hungrycanidae
    hungrycanidae liked this · 1 year ago
  • nii--chan
    nii--chan reblogged this · 1 year ago
  • precureedfan
    precureedfan reblogged this · 1 year ago
  • precureedfan
    precureedfan liked this · 1 year ago
  • twistyrob-1425
    twistyrob-1425 liked this · 1 year ago
  • sayakasreblogcorner
    sayakasreblogcorner reblogged this · 1 year ago
  • miki-kaname
    miki-kaname liked this · 1 year ago
  • hellengomes
    hellengomes reblogged this · 1 year ago
  • hellengomes
    hellengomes liked this · 1 year ago
  • canandroidsdream
    canandroidsdream liked this · 1 year ago
  • starryneitz
    starryneitz reblogged this · 1 year ago
  • starryneitz
    starryneitz liked this · 1 year ago
  • mecheye
    mecheye liked this · 1 year ago
  • lavender-blush
    lavender-blush reblogged this · 1 year ago
  • lavender-blush
    lavender-blush liked this · 1 year ago
  • fluffydragonchips
    fluffydragonchips liked this · 1 year ago
  • concrete-3ater
    concrete-3ater liked this · 1 year ago
  • monarchenwinter
    monarchenwinter reblogged this · 1 year ago
  • monarchenwinter
    monarchenwinter liked this · 1 year ago
  • niaskotl
    niaskotl liked this · 1 year ago

More Posts from Majokkid

1 year ago

Why I am a Materialist

It be surprising or confusing to some that I am both a materialist and practice magick. I believe that comes from a misconception of what materialism means. Wikipedia gets us off to a start:

"Materialism is a form of philosophical monism which holds that matter is the fundamental substance in nature, and that all things, including mental states and consciousness, are results of material interactions of material things."

To this I say yes, but where I differ is what follows:

"Materialism directly contrasts with idealism, according to which consciousness is the fundamental substance of nature."

To this I say no, there is no conflict. The apparent conflict is the result of a kind of category error. Consciousness produces material and then binds itself to it. At one level of emanation consciousness is fundamental and at the next the material is fundamental.

But what is the material? Well, physics is essentially mathematics. The physical/material is whatever can be described by mathematics. Absolutely anything that exists and can be shown to exist can be described by mathematical equations. Anything with a stable predictable nature can be described by math. We mistake the map for the territory when we assert this means that the entities in these mathematical models are "real".

If anything non-physical could be proved to exist it would be physical by the definition by whatever proof could be provided. The proof itself is a type of mathematics.

Now, what may be more surprising and confusing is that I don't think magick is real, and yet I practice it. The confusion again is a type of category error. Magick is what makes reality. It isn't real because it isn't the sort of thing that would be real. Magick isn't a thing and it can't be described. Magick can only be performed and no explanation can explain it.


Tags :