HopeThese Three Major Scenes Show How Hope Is Important In The Movie. Human Beings Have Always, And Always






Hope These three major scenes show how hope is important in the movie. Human beings have always, and always will be driven by hope. When Tanya dies, Curtis promises they will find Timmy. I’m not even sure he believes it himself, but when Tanya says “I know”, it’s almost certain she knows it will never happen. She has seen everyone dying around them, she knows Andrew never got to see his son again so she doesn’t believe a word of it. No, they won’t find Timmy. But she needs to believe it, she needs to be at peace when she dies. And when she says “Thank you”, she doesn’t thank him for finding Timmy, or saving their lives, because clearly Curtis didn’t, but for giving them all tail-sectioners something they hadn’t had in 18 years: hope. She’s not dying with her son in her arms but with hope. Yes, she’s dying but she didn’t spend her last days as an exploited sheep. She died believing for a short while that another life was possible. That’s why she apparently thanks him for nothing. He didn’t give her a good life, resources, food or goods, he gave her even more.
The second scene shows how when he loses hope, Curtis loses everything. He ran from the tail to the Front because he thought he had absolutely nothing to lose, and sure, he owned nothing, so it seemed logical. But the very moment he realizes he has lost his people and most importantly, lost Gilliam, it’s over for him. Not Gilliam as a human being -he was already half-dead-, but as a father figure, a role model, an example. The moment Curtis realizes Gilliam is dirty, when he understands that yes Wilford knew Gilliam for real, it’s like he’s learning his God is evil. Everything he had, Gilliam’s support, his beliefs, his certitudes, everything is washed away by this little sentence. He’s got no one to look up to anymore. If even the holy figure of Gilliam was rotten, he doesn’t know what to fight for anymore. It’s clearly visible in the second gif, when he’s inside the Engine. Alone. All alone for the first time in eighteen years. What does he do? He looks behind himself, looks for help. Such loneliness is overwhelming. He knows everybody he loved and cared about is dead, the only one still alive is Nam who never really respected him, called him a ‘tail-section prick’. And in a moment when he’s supposed to think about what he’s gonna do now he’s got no one to guide him -no one but Wilford. Everything he thought he knew was fake, everything he thought was right is wrong. And this is the face of a man who lost everything he had: a little bit of hope. This is why Curtis is about to go dark and take Wilford’s place, until he sees Timmy and remember what he was fighting for in the first place. What Tanya was fighting for. Last but not least, the final scene is full of hope despite its sadness. The kids might die, very soon, but they realize that all the Front section lies weren’t true. The Engine stopped and they didn’t freeze and die. They can even remove their hoods, so yes it’s super cold but not dying cold. There’s even life! Dangerous life, of course, but life. The kids might die soon, it’s probable, but it was worth it because they’ll be free for a while. They will believe that another life is possible, believe it on their own, not because Wilford lied to them.
-
lopadopalis reblogged this · 11 months ago
-
jansadboihours liked this · 5 years ago
-
geeketteschatpodcast reblogged this · 5 years ago
-
geeketteschatpodcast liked this · 5 years ago
-
becomethecolour liked this · 5 years ago
-
fiftyscenes reblogged this · 7 years ago
-
fiftyscenes liked this · 7 years ago
-
stoveandhisbucket reblogged this · 7 years ago
-
stoveandhisbucket liked this · 7 years ago
-
just-sitting-on-the-shelf liked this · 9 years ago
-
the-werewolf-that-ate-my-dog liked this · 9 years ago
-
atlxolotl liked this · 9 years ago
-
bagoa reblogged this · 9 years ago
-
bagoa liked this · 9 years ago
-
koooolaaaaa liked this · 10 years ago
-
thelightofthingshopedfor liked this · 10 years ago
-
ifihadcatears-blog liked this · 11 years ago
-
grippingtraverse reblogged this · 11 years ago
-
grippingtraverse liked this · 11 years ago
-
unexpected-nightview liked this · 11 years ago
-
stitchingatthecircuitboard liked this · 11 years ago
-
91047589c1658302w19374625131 liked this · 11 years ago
-
cityskylineatyourfingertips reblogged this · 11 years ago
-
temperoumbra reblogged this · 11 years ago
-
dangercupcakemurdericing liked this · 11 years ago
-
grayjumper reblogged this · 11 years ago
-
punchitmrsulu reblogged this · 11 years ago
-
ladygretashepard liked this · 11 years ago
-
swedishmountaingoat liked this · 11 years ago
-
sorry-ari liked this · 11 years ago
-
badlaaa liked this · 11 years ago
-
xcsmxshadow34 liked this · 11 years ago
-
jennysonrosero reblogged this · 11 years ago
-
m3atbuff3t liked this · 11 years ago
-
kamalaskadoosh reblogged this · 11 years ago
-
zan77 reblogged this · 11 years ago
-
sorrel-ly liked this · 11 years ago
-
sage-sloth reblogged this · 11 years ago
-
brentofthefabulouswild reblogged this · 11 years ago
-
brentofthefabulouswild liked this · 11 years ago
More Posts from Lopadopalis
“games aren’t art, huh???” *picture of skyrim*
I want to be the first person on the moon to shoot a sniper rifle at earth and hit a wasp nest. my whole life so far is leading up to that moment

It's 1996 and the hit new game Signalis has just hit the shelves, and you've just rented a copy from your local Blockbuster. It's a Friday night, no homework, no school tomorrow. You have snacks and soda, and you're ready to game.
The Symbolic Use of Special Effects in Snowpiercer
written by K.K *CONTAINS SPOILERS*

The use of special effects in film has long been a highly debated area in the film industry. Resentment for special effects largely stems from the idea that it distracts the audience from the narrative of the film and thus threatens the realism that the film presents. Therefore, digital technologies makes filmic images fraudulent by imposing the artificial on the real.
Snowpiercer is a 2013 science fiction film by South Korean director Boog Joon Ho. The film follows a self-sustaining train that circulates the Earth yearlong at a constant high speed. It was created and developed to withstand the extreme temperatures that inflict the Earth in this apocalyptic world. The last of humanity is situated on this train as the consequence of the Earth entering a world-wide ice age. This was caused by an experimental substance that was launched into the atmosphere 17 years ago in the hope to neutralise the Earth’s climate that had been destroyed by environmental damaged. Interestingly, the train embodies an even stricter and more apparent classist hierarchy that had been modelled from pre-apocalyptic times. The first few carriages of the train are for the 1% that managed to secure their spot through hefty initial payments. The end few carriages are reserved for the ‘free loaders’. They are required to give up their labour, skills, children and livelihood for the running and maintenance of the train. Upward mobility is strictly prohibited. The plot follows the uprising of the end carriage and their attempts to force their way to the first carriage.
Upon first glance, Snowpiercer appears to be only about class struggles and the perils of capitalism. However, Snowpiercer also tackles notions of simulation, hyperreality and the relationship between the real and the artificial as defined by Baudrillard (1994). As a modern science fiction film, it also physically showcases a range of technologically advanced special effect features.

As a large quantity of the film is set inside the train, Snowpiercer displays incredibly advanced CGI to produce a seamless image of a constantly moving train. It is only half way through the film that the viewer catches a glimpse of the outside world through a window in the middle carriages. This glimpse is dramatised in two ways. As the story follows the members of the last carriage, the viewer is placed to directly experience the visual images of these characters. As the last carriage members push their way through the tight security driven nature of the carriages, a sudden drop in music occurs when they suddenly come across windows. The dusky tones of the dank, diseased driven and morbid last carriages in the first half of the film is contrasted with the icy and bright tones of the outside world. The dramatisation of this serves not only to visually and sensually please the viewer but also highlight the real and the artificial. For many of the characters in the film, they have not seen the outside or ‘real’ world for 17 years. Other characters do not even know the outside world as they were born on the train. The importance of this fact is emphasised through the constant referral to ‘train babies’ and the portrayal of their naivety. One such train baby character exclaims, “In the whole wide train?” in response to an adult bribing him for his protein snack. The train is a metaphor for the hyperreal. The realism of the hyperreal is only put into question when the characters are able to distinguish between the real and the artificial - the view of the outside world and the inside of the train. As this scene suggests, the real is realised only through the juxtaposition of the artificial. In this way the real is produced only through a pre-existed hyperreality.
Notions of the real and the artificial are explored further through the film. The aim of the tail carriage passengers is to reach the first carriage and demand equality within the train. They have no intentions of entering the ‘outside world’. The train, the copy of their pre-apocalyptic world, is their hyperreality. Their mission is very much linear. This is emphasised literally as their physical journey through the train is also linear. However, two characters, father and daughter, push past the linear mentality of all the passengers by seeking to exit the train, thereby exiting the artificial reality the creator of the train had produced and reinforced.

The final scene is the biggest twist in the film; the train eventually fails and is destroyed by the upheaval caused by the passengers. Through a series of frantic events, the film ends with two train babies escaping the rumble of the train as the sole survivors. The daughter of the security technician and a little boy who was forcibly removed from the last carriage in order to physically provide his body to upkeep the movement of the train, are the survivors. To their shock, they entered the ‘real’ world and are not killed by the atmosphere and intense cold as described by the adults on the train. The ice is melting, the Earth has renewed. This twist in the film takes an interesting spin on the real and the artificial. Is the train really the artificial? Is the outside world really the real? The outside world does not resemble what it once was, nor do the two surviving characters have any knowledge of the outside world. As train babies, the real world to them was the supposed hyperreal. The real and the artificial do not have distinct set boundaries, they are undefinable.

As suggested above, Snowpiercer embodies the concept of the real and the artificial in its narrative. Interestingly, digital technologies are used to create special effects to aid the narrative. Both the outside world and the inside world uses CGI to enhance the images captured on camera. Therefore visually, both the real and the artificial are indistinguishable in terms of visual manipulation, thus symbolising that the real and the artificial are too indistinguishable. It is interesting to note however, that much of the outside world, as seen through the windows in the train, have been totally computerised. This encourages the viewer to challenge preconceived notions of the real and the artificial. The special effects in Snowpiercer do not detract from the narrative of the film, but in turn strengthens it.
Bong Joon Ho’s, Snowpiercer, cleverly showcases the way digital technologies have enabled filmmakers to explore powerful new forms of images through special effects. Most importantly, the rise of digital technologies and the subsequent debate surrounding the jeopardy of the ‘purity’ of film has enabled filmmakers, like Bong Joon Ho, to create powerful and artistic commentary on the notions of the real and the artificial.