
or jan Tosi; sometimes obnoxious maths, sometimes obnoxious judaism, most of the time a secret third obnoxious thing. she/they on my pronouns till I gender
527 posts
The Pigeonhole Principle: If You Have N Pigeons And N+1 Holes, Then There Must Be Some Pigeon With At
The pigeonhole principle: If you have n pigeons and n+1 holes, then there must be some pigeon with at least two holes in it. That poor pigeon. Don't ask me why they made this principle so gruesome.
It's hypothetically possible that I may have mixed up the order, but ehhhh, whatever.
-
amnonian liked this · 1 year ago
-
dorothytheexplorothy reblogged this · 1 year ago
-
dorothytheexplorothy liked this · 1 year ago
-
deerest-me liked this · 1 year ago
-
potorch liked this · 1 year ago
-
halflingthief liked this · 1 year ago
-
haiimrowie reblogged this · 1 year ago
-
sassyrowie liked this · 1 year ago
-
theaxiomofhope liked this · 1 year ago
-
amarocit liked this · 1 year ago
-
dynamicsbitch reblogged this · 1 year ago
-
dambiex liked this · 1 year ago
-
learning-is-underrated reblogged this · 1 year ago
-
catscomputerscreativewriting liked this · 1 year ago
-
flameshadowconjuring liked this · 1 year ago
-
one-plus-root-five-over-two reblogged this · 1 year ago
-
thegatekeeperofzuan liked this · 1 year ago
-
arehera liked this · 2 years ago
-
evelynrose33284 reblogged this · 2 years ago
-
evelynrose33284 liked this · 2 years ago
-
aratherlargeboiledfish liked this · 2 years ago
-
atlaswashere liked this · 2 years ago
-
rooseveltstreetsvelvettutu liked this · 2 years ago
-
eheu-vae-mihi reblogged this · 2 years ago
-
jarkinesbrainstew reblogged this · 2 years ago
-
identitylambda liked this · 2 years ago
-
polymorphemic-vector liked this · 2 years ago
-
speronyx liked this · 2 years ago
-
mirror-dog liked this · 2 years ago
-
midnight-catboy liked this · 2 years ago
-
uniquedelusionpenguin liked this · 2 years ago
-
flickersphinx liked this · 2 years ago
-
thatguy-2357 reblogged this · 2 years ago
-
thatguy-2357 liked this · 2 years ago
-
trilobyteme reblogged this · 2 years ago
-
trilobyteme liked this · 2 years ago
-
hacvek liked this · 2 years ago
-
galo1s liked this · 2 years ago
-
approximatelywibble reblogged this · 2 years ago
-
cea-tide reblogged this · 2 years ago
-
preciselywibble liked this · 2 years ago
-
wuwojiti reblogged this · 2 years ago
-
wuwojiti liked this · 2 years ago
-
caratheody-diffable liked this · 2 years ago
More Posts from Dorothytheexplorothy
1. it's always easier to work in modular arithmetic (finite addition table!), so find the first primorial that's at least the larger number = 210 = 2*3*5*7
every number up to 210 is uniquely determined by its values mod each of these primes.
156 = 2(mod7),1(mod5),0(mod3),0(mod2)
25 = 4,0,1,1
now to add them you only need pointwise modular addition
2,1,0,0 + 4,0,1,1 = 6,1,1,1
and then just find the smallest number with these modular values = 181
the only edge case is when this system overflows, so in that case you take the smallest number with these values that's also larger than both summands.
2. evaluating multiplication is harder than addition, so we approximate 2*45+15 as 2*(45+15)=2*60. then by distributivity the error is 2*15-15, which is (2-1)*15=1*15. doing this simpler multiplication by hand, we have 1*15=15, so 2*45+15 = 2*60±15. better approximations can be made but this is good enough for most purposes.
3. for division we combine our last two ideas of modular arithmetic and approximations. start with the smallest prime greater than 104 = 107, and note that there is a finite field under addition and multiplication mod 107. so in particular, it has an element 1/8, which we can find easily by noticing that 1/8=(1/2)³. 1/2 is easy to find, since 1 equals 108 mod 107, which is even, and so 1/2 = 54 mod 107. now we compute 54³ mod 107 and get 67. so we take 104*1/8 ≈ 104*67 mod 107 = 13 as a first approximation. now we check 13*8 = 104 (w/o modding!) and we're done! if the numerator weren't divisible by 8 we would've gotten a wrong answer (for example, (105*67)%107=80, 8*80≠105) and in that case we repeatedly subtract 67 (mod 107) from the answer until we have (8*answer+#times we've subtracted 67) = numerator. the answer is the integral division and the number of times we subtracted 67 is the remainder.
hope that helps:)
ok so for personal reasons I need some of the dumbest, goofiest, most elaborate cutting-your-toast-with-a-chainsaw type ways to do elementary school arithmetic problems. the type of stuff we did to that "whats 48+7" poll
my first thought for calculating 104/8 is to convert into base 8, then bitshift one to the right and then convert back but I feel like thats too simple
so, hit me with your best shot at solving the following problems:
whats 156 + 25
what's 2*45 + 15
what's 104/8

it’s a common misconception that maths is all theoretical; they actually keep the 0 in a vault in France and u can go look at it if u got connections.
Bitches love me for my proofs of formal equivalence between two seemingly unrelated things
if you give me an arbitrary computer program with a certain input i can tell whether it halts or not. rip to you but i’m different