"You'd Be Living In A Castle With Food And Medicine And Trained Squirrels To Tend To Your Every Need."

"You'd be living in a castle with food and medicine and trained squirrels to tend to your every need."

bonus ver w/o text and extra doodle:

Does Bonnie make a robo companion Jake dog for finn? Or does Finn have no Jake :(

Finn has no Jake in this world. They were separated when Finn left the baby world, and Finn was too young to remember him- but there is definitely a sense of loss that Finn doesn't really understand.

But Bonnie did make a somewhat companion for him! His peppermint watch! It has the same consciousness as the peppermint tank and it keeps him company on his missions (And it helps Bonnie keep a close eye on him)

i will never get over the fact hunter thought rex and anakin were going to have sex

a writer from another fandom (shoutout to entirelytookeen) was talking about sorting characters and said, "[Gryffindor] will do the right thing even if it kills her, [Slytherin] will do the right thing even if it kills everyone else." what do you think of that take on the Gryffindor/Slytherin divide?

That is very interesting. I’ve been thinking about it ever since you sent this. I mean, if we look at Harry, yes. Definitely. This fits. And if we look at, say, Voldemort. Or even Draco. Sure. Yes. (Although we need to be careful with what is the ‘right thing’ here. According to who? I might say ‘do what is important’)

It can be argued that Harry represents in many ways the best of Gryffindor house, while Voldemort (and possibly Draco) represent the worst of Slytherin house. So it isn’t quite a fair comparison. After all, there are canonical Slytherin who sacrificed themselves, or were willing to put their own lives in danger. (Regulus, Snape, Slughorn, for example.) Alternatively, Gryffindor’s reckless nature can cause harm to others when they are at their worst. It may not be their intention, bit it is often the outcome.

So maybe I would revise and say: Gryffindor tend more towards sacrifice, and Slytherin tend more towards preservation. Gryffindor focus on ‘how might my sacrifice be good for others, how do my actions make things good right now’ while Slytherin might focus on ‘what can be done so no sacrifice is needed, and what parameters do I use to decide what sacrifice will be needed.’ At their worst, this can mean throwing everyone but themselves in front of the curse, at their best, this can mean keeping anyone from getting hit by the curse. Just like at their best, Gryffindor’s sacrifice impulse can save lives at the cost of only their own, but at their worst, even more lives are damaged because of their impulsive, short-sighted sacrifice and lack of understanding of the full implications beyond their own heroics.

Or, even that Gryffindor focus on saving everyone, and Slytherin focus on saving what’s important. Which might even be a matter of idealism versus pragmatism. Which may come back to your friend’s very well-stated point: if it came down to it, a Slytherin would be able to sacrifice others if it was necessary, whereas a Gryffindor might not. Which is rather exactly the kind of role I had Ginny play in The Changeling during that last year with the DA. She made the tough decisions she knew her Gryffindor (and Hufflepuff) counterpart may not have been able to make. She understood that there are far more kinds of sacrifice than your own life. That living with it can be even harder than dying for it.

What does Finn call Bonnie and Marcy? Like for example does he call Bonnie Sargent and Marcy Star???

Finn usually refers to Bonnie as either just "Bonnie", or "ma'am" for more serious conversations.

As for Marceline... when they had just met, before he knew her name, he'd call her "The Star", like the rest of the world, and the "vamp princess". He'd still refer to her by those names for a while after learning her real name, alongside some rude nicknames because she deserves it.... But eventually, he does add "Marceline" and "Marcy" to his vocabulary.

your honor. is it not literally them